引用本文:邓延慧,李旦,TANVEER M ADYEL,万冰洲.环境中微塑料的定量分析方法研究进展[J].环境监控与预警,2020,12(5):32-37
DENG Yan-hui, LI Dan,TANVEER M ADYEL,WAN Bing-zhou.Research Progress of Analytical Methods for Microplastics in the Environment[J].Environmental Monitoring and Forewarning,2020,12(5):32-37
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 4203次   下载 1743 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
环境中微塑料的定量分析方法研究进展
邓延慧,李旦,TANVEER M ADYEL,万冰洲1,2
1.江苏省环境科学研究院,江苏 南京 210036;2.东南大学-蒙纳士大学苏州联合研究生院,江苏 苏州 215123
摘要:
从数量浓度和质量浓度2种不同的量化角度,对现有的微塑料定量分析方法(目检法、光谱法和热分析法)进行了系统梳理和综合阐述,其中,目检法操作简便但准确度低,光谱法准确度高但耗时过长,热分析法简便快速但不利于溯源分析。在系统综述的基础上,对未来需要深入研究的方向作了分析和展望。
关键词:  微塑料  定性分析  定量分析
DOI:
分类号:X830
文献标识码:A
基金项目:国家自然科学基金国际(地区)合作与交流基金资助项目(51950410589)
Research Progress of Analytical Methods for Microplastics in the Environment
DENG Yan-hui, LI Dan,TANVEER M ADYEL,WAN Bing-zhou1,2
1.Jiangsu Provincial Academy of Environmental Science,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210036,China;2.Southeast UniversityMonash University Joint Graduate School (Suzhou),Suzhou,Jiangsu 215123,China
Abstract:
In this paper, the existing quantitative analysis methods of microplastics(visual method, spectroscopic method and thermal analysis) are comprehensively explained from two different quantitative perspectives of quantity concentration and mass concentration. Among them, the visual method is simple to operate but has low accuracy, the spectroscopic method has high accuracy but takes long time, and the thermal analysis method is simple and fast but not conducive to traceability analysis. On the basis of the systematic review, the future research directions that need in depth research are summarized and prospected.
Key words:  Microplastics  Qualitative identification  Quantitative analysis